draco malfoy was a rich, attractive, pureblood
blood supremacist boy who never missed an opportunity to bully harry (making
fun of him for being an orphan, losing his godfather, being scared of
dementors, etc), make fun of ron and his family for being poor, insulting
neville, and constantly calling hermione a ‘mudblood’. he does not have a
redemption arc, and is never seen being sorry for any of the horrible things he
has done in his life. people excuse his racism because it’s ‘how he was
raised’ and talk about how he did the things he did out of outside pressure. he
lets death eaters into a school full of children to kill someone. bill is mauled with
an injury that affects him for life; dumbledore is murdered. but
apparently being unable to murder someone in cold blood counts
as ‘redemption’. the only evidence that he changes at all is jk’s
handwavy ‘he’s a better person when he’s older’ stuff. there is nothing in
canon. he’s a favourite among fans, and people talk about him like he’s a
wonderful person who should be praised and let off with everything he’s done.
it’s perfect acceptable to have him as a favourite, and to ship him with anyone
(even hermione, the main victim of his racist bullying).
james potter was a rich, attractive, pureblood
boy who never missed an opportunity to bully snape (making fun of him for being
ugly, a slytherin, unclean (most definitely a product of his neglect), etc) .he
bullies him because ‘he exists, if you know what i mean.’ and because lily
and snape are friends, and lily won’t go out with him. he walks
around ‘hexing anyone who annoys [him] just because [he] can.’ and constantly
harasses lily. -asking her out, threatening to hurt her, trying to emotionally
blackmail her into dating him, etc. he gets away with bullying for years, bases
his relationship with lily on a lie (that he’s stopped bullying), and yet
people idolise the ground he walks on. they think he’s funny, good looking, charming.
that he’d be a feminist. there are countless
people who blog cute headcanons about him and his friends without once talking
about his bullying. or worse, they claim it didn’t happen. or, even worse, they
go full victim-blaming and say snape had it coming. that an eleven year old boy
deserved to have his school years made hell because he ‘exists’ and is
friends with a girl. the fact that he was a good friend and fought for the
light means everything bad he did doesn’t matter. it’s perfectly acceptable to
have him as a favourite, and jily is praised as a perfect ship.
severus
snape is a poor, ugly, halfblood boy, who was canonically abused/neglected by a
muggle as a child. he has one person in his life who is kind to him. all adults
treat him terribly - either condoning his abuse, treating him like he deserves
it, or acting like he should thank his abusers. after being neglected/abused
his whole life, he goes off to hogwarts (a place that he should finally be able
to be himself and feel safe and like he belongs) and within moments of even
stepping foot onto the train he’s singled out by sirius and james and a victim.
they then spend the next seven years bullying this boy ‘relentlessly’.
snape faces huge pressure from outside sources to join the death eaters, but he
holds off for years. he’s unable to exist as an island with only one friend,
and is forced to spend time with his housemates. he gradually is immersed
further into their company, till his morals and self of self are blurred. while
being borderline sexually assaulted, he lashes out and calls lily
a ‘mudblood’. he’s vilified for this forever. he doesn’t complain about
it, or try to threaten her. he doesn’t act the victim and make excuses. he
doesn’t say ‘what is it with her?’ like james when lily doesn’t want anything
to do with him. he’s genuinely apologetic, and when she asks him to leave her
alone, he does. forever. without anyone who cares about him, he loses his
reservations and joins the death eaters. he has an unintentional role in lily’s
death, and he feels so guilty that he dedicates his life to
protecting her son, because he knows how much he means to her, and wants to do
right by her. when she dies, his grief and guilt is manipulated by dumbledore
to convince him of this. but, since he’s physically unable to just, idk, make
himself stop loving lily (which everyone can do, ofc), he’s entirely seen as a
creep, unfeminist, a misogynist. never mind that he never once complains about
lily not choosing him. never mind that he refers to her as ‘lily potter’
because he recognises that she chose to marry james, and won’t take that away
from her (like a misogynist would). he calls neville names, and treats harry
unfairly, and occasionally insults hermione. his experiences have shaped him
into an unpleasant, bitter, rather cruel person. he’s also one of the few
teachers that consistently protects the children in his care, and never
intentionally puts them in danger (unlike mcgonagall and hagrid). he puts up
with harry and co being shits to him (anyone remember that time they
set him on fire) they steal from him, disrespect him, and harry p much
constantly assumes he’s the big bad of each book and treats him accordingly.
(it’s pretty much everyone saying ‘seriously, harry, it’s not snape.’ with
harry replying ‘it’s fucking snape, i know it.’) snape
complains to dumbledore, and treats harry worse in retaliation (their
relationship is just one big example of escalation). snape is forced (by that
person) to kill the only person he trusts (and who doesn’t think he’s evil and
irredeemable), he’s forced to go through torture, face the person who murdered
the only person who cared about him, forced to lie to everyone he knows, and is
never allowed to talk about the things he’s been through because it would break
his cover. he’s probably the richest, most complex character in the series, and
people ignore his canon experiences and actions and write posts with tens of
thousands of notes praising draco and james, and simplifying snape to
a ‘friendzoned child abuser blood supremacist who wanted to bang lily
evans’. anyone seen talking about snape in a positive light, or god forbid
liking him as a character, is immediately attacked. they’re told they ‘condone
chid bullying’. they’re treated like shit, because they like the character. nevermind
that most people who like snape do so because they identify with him (the
person who identifies with him the most, is, funnily enough, harry –but people
don’t want to think about that). the exact same things that you use to excuse
your faves, you use to demonize snape. People will say ‘I know it doesn’t
excuse his actions, but I really think people need to take snape’s childhood
and the kind of pressures he would’ve faced with his life and being a
half-blood in slytherin at the time.’ and they’ll be accused of making excuses
for him. even though that’s the thing that gets most people to forgive draco. there’s
no ‘he was 15! everyone’s an idiot when they’re 15!’ boys will be boys BS for
snape, just james.
Look. If you’re a james or draco
fan that likes them but doesn’t deny/ignore the bad things they’ve done,
because despite the bad you can still see the good and can relate to them, then
brilliant. I respect you. keep on keeping on. that’s how we feel. this isn’t
aimed at you, and sorry I’m being callous about your faves. this is entirely
aimed at those people who will idolise draco and james and completely ignore
the fact that draco during his Hogwarts years is completely pro blood purity
and that james relentlessly bullies a vulnerable, disadvantaged boy for seven
years with no punishment. I’m very tired of snape being held to this ridiculous
standard and being demonized for things that other characters easily get away
with. you want to say that snape being unfair in regards to points with harry
and frequently calling him arrogant in class ‘because he hates his father’
makes him an irredeemable child abuser? okay. where are the hundreds of 50k
notes posts discussing the time that hagrid’s pissed with Vernon so he decides
to physically disfigure his 11 year old son? Dudley is terrified to the point
of hysterics at the idea of magic for years
because of that. he needs surgery.
because hagrid lost his temper and decided to physically hurt the man he was
mad at’s son to deal with it. we aren’t going to talk about hagrid making fun
of a young child’s weight? really? what about the countless other times
teachers have mocked the kids? McGonagall insults neville’s intelligence in
front of a large number of the school and his peers twice. she locks him out of Gryffindor when there’s a mass murderer on the loose because he
made a genuine mistake. he could very easily have died. where are the posts
calling her a vile child abuser? she’s hermione’s boggart. if you claim context
isn’t relevant to neville’s boggart, then it isn’t to hermione’s. it’s
mcgonagall, and that’s all that apparently matters. I am sick of this.
your opinion on a fictional
character does not define you as a person. If you acknowledge that the
characters have faults and don’t ignore the bad things they have done, then go
ahead and like them all you want. you should
not try to force people to have the same opinions on fictional people as you
do. stop it.